Why pilfering doesn’t pay




Home page
TYPE DESIGN

Design notes
Basics
Decisions
   
Tests
   
Golden section
   
Limitations
   
Imitation
   
Font metrics
   
More metrics
   Pilfering
Modules
Bold
Italic
Scans
Spacing
Elbow grease

Glossary


Old favourites don’t mix
Making a new typeface by blending two existing designs is simple enough. But it isn’t worth the trouble. I will now show you why it isn’t.





The typeface Frutiger is, in my opinion, the most beautiful sans-serif ever made. The light version seems a promising start to a new design.




A bold Franklin Gothic is quite different. To my mind, Morris Fuller Benton gave it roughness that borders on the brutal. By blending the two, we can make a new font with a look of its own. But it’s not a good idea. (Cross a dachshund with a St Bernard, and you get a mongrel that chases into holes in the ground to rescue mountaineers.)

Preparing the base fonts will take a while. Each design must match the other, character by character, Bézier point for Bézier point. Making sure they do calls for careful work.




The letters g in Frutiger and Franklin Gothic have different structure. Blending them won’t do.




We can make a new letter g in Franklin Gothic from the letter d and the letter f, upside-down. It will blend with the letter g in Frutiger. We can now proceed.




The result: bland and flawed
At first glance, the blend doesn’t look bad. But a closer look will reveal disappointing details. Here are three.




At the stem, the white countershape in the letter b looks lumpy. This is hardly surprising. One of the base fonts has a curve where the other has corners.




The inside and outside curves of the letter c have different shapes. It tapers awkwardly from thick to thin.

The letter s is too light, especially in the middle, and looks ready to fall over backwards. The shape will need more work.

Two disadvantages
Blending Frutiger and Franklin Gothic is not a quick shortcut. Preparing them takes time. And the new typeface would need a lot of work before it could be used. It doesn’t have much character. After our toil, what have we got to show for it? A faceless average. That’s one drawback.

The other is this. Rendering other peoples work doesn’t get you far. A blend of two existing typefaces doesn’t express your ideas about your ideal sans-serif. If the new type doesn’t show your own convictions, what is the point of doing all that work?